- Who was the most able king of the Khilji (خلجی) dynasty? Describe the measures he took to make his rule prosperous and peaceful.
The Khilji dynasty ruled the Delhi Sultanate for 30 years; out of which 20 years were under Alauddin Khilji (علاؤالدّین خلجی). Alauddin was no doubt the most able and powerful ruler of the Khilji dynasty.
He established a strong army to deal with internal and external threats, as well as to expand his empire; this brought peace to his kingdom. To make his empire prosperous he brought prices of food items under the state control, fixed taxes, introduced land reforms to control the power of nobles (the Jagirdars). Public meetings were banned to stop rebellious thoughts and movements. He also promoted education which in turn further developed the economy.
- Why were the Mongols a threat to the Delhi sultanate? Who can be compared to them in the earlier history of the Hindu kingdoms?
The Mongol empire was the largest of its time; it had ended the Abbasid dynasty in Arabia and was spreading fast from Mongolia. Seeing the past history of invasions of India by Central Asian and Greek invaders, and present zeal and passion of the Mongols, it was not impossible that the Delhi Sultanate would be raided and ended too.
Mongols can be compared to the Huns in the Gupta era (c. 320 – 550 CE) who like the Mongols were a warrior tribe from Central Asia and took pleasure in plundering and destroying everything.
- How did Timur’s invasion become an important event for the Delhi Sultanate?
In 1398, Timur routed the army of the Delhi Sultan, Nasiruddin Mahmud Shah Tughlaq. His soldiers ransacked Delhi for three days. This invasion left India plundered and devastated. Timur, like Sultan Mahmud of Ghanzi, took Indian artisans and craftsmen back with him to develop his own empire. The Sultanate of Delhi lost its power and broke up into many small states.
- Explain why the two experiments by Muhammad (bin) Tughlaq (محمد بن تغلق) to improve his rule failed.
His first experiment of token currency failed because despite his vast knowledge and intelligence, he was not enough far sighted. He could not have anticipated the possibility of forged money.
Perhaps out of his overambitious nature and overconfidence, he made one more experiment which ended in a disaster. This time again, he did not prove to be a far sighted ruler. A lot of people died on the way to his new capital, Daulatabad. It could not maintain the new population without any fresh water supply.
- Who was Ibn Batuta (ابن بطوطہ)? Why are people like him important for the subject of history?
Ibn Batuta was a Moroccan traveller who came to India in 1333. He had started his travels at the age of 21 and journeyed through Africa and Asia.
Historians generally depend on previously written books and word of mouth before writing history. Such works are not as reliable as those which are created when a historian himself meets people in person and visits places to record biographies and events. Ibn Batuta was from the same kind of historians who extensively travelled to vast areas; served in India for 7 years as a judge. His works reflect his personal experience and the firsthand information.
- Why is Feroz (Shah) Tughlaq’s reign different from that of Muhammad (bin) Tughlaq?
He was not as good at warfare as his predecessor, Muhammad Tughlaq was, but he became prominent because of his welfare efforts. To improve agriculture and the life of the peasant, Feroz (Shah) Tughlaq started irrigation of farmlands by having canals dug. These canals were later retained and extended by the British. In addition, 150 wells were dug, and wheat, sugarcane, and fruits were grown extensively.
Feroz (Shah) Tughlaq (فیروز شاہ تغلق) was different from Muhammad (bin) Tughlaq in one more respect. Like the Mughal Emperor Shah Jehan, he was a master builder and equalled the Roman Emperor Augustus’ love for building. He constructed five towns, 30 palaces, 200 caravan serais, 100 bridges, 1200 gardens, 10 monumental pillars, and 10 public baths.
- What was different about the Sayyid and Lodhi dynasties? What were the impacts of their rules?
The Sayyid dynasty ruled a small Sultanate for roughly fifty years. It was Turk in origin. They were replaced by an Afghan, Bahlol Lodhi (بہلول) who founded the Lodhi dynasty that lasted for seventy five years.
Lodhis were comparatively stronger than the Sayyids. They expanded their kingdom under Bahlol and Sikander. The rule of Sikander (سکندر) saw the beginning and rise of Hindu and Sikh revivalist movements – the Bhakti Movement and Sikhism, which later largely impacted the history of the subcontinent.